Professional judgment remains with the architect.
Reasonable Control names the proposed verification and documentation method. It helps architects exercise and demonstrate responsible control, as defined by applicable licensing law.
Revision 2 · October 8, 2026
Reasonable Control: Verification and Documentation of Machine-Assisted Work in Architectural Practice
A voluntary practice framework for licensed architects and architectural firms.
The premise
Artificial intelligence has not altered the architect’s standard of care. It has created new ways to breach it. When production outruns review, a firm can issue material machine-assisted content without having verified it or recorded how it was checked.
What the Guide contributes
Reasonable Control names the proposed verification and documentation method. It helps architects exercise and demonstrate responsible control, as defined by applicable licensing law.
Verification brings together a stated criterion, an authoritative source, and a recorded result.
The record identifies what was machine-assisted, how it was verified, by whom, when, and with what disposition.
The complete publication
The production-verification gap and the questions it creates.
Responsible control, verification, source identification, competence, confidentiality, records, and reserved decisions.
Evidence on automated advice, training, and the information available during a task.
Verification and documentation for architectural tasks.
The project context and verification entries that make the work reconstructable.
What adoption and conformance can show when the firm must account for its work.
Implementation at three practice scales and the Guide’s conformance statement.
Definitions, source distinctions, recommendations, and limits.
Working sheets for firm decisions, task classification, project sources, verification records, and the decision to issue.